Bed Rest is No Longer the Best Option For Back Pain

Low back pain is one of the most commonOver the years, studies have emerged showing
reasons for consulting a physician. Despite littlethat bed rest of any duration is not effective for
supporting scientific evidence, bed rest waslow back pain and that it often delays recovery.
considered the primary treatment from the lateIn fact, other than delayed recovery, prolonged
19th century. What has changed now is how backbed rest can also have detrimental effects on the
pain is understood and managed.body. Patients with prolonged bed rest may end
History of Back Pain and Restup with osteoporosis (bone calcium loss), muscle
Rest was first proposed as a treatment by Johnwasting due to muscle protein loss, deep vein
Hunter (1728-1793), a Scottish surgeon, in histhrombosis and undesirable psychological effects.
study on wounds and inflammation. He believedCurrent Approach
that the first and most important requisite forSo the question now is, if bed rest has been
restoration of inflamed, injured parts is rest, asshown to be detrimental and ineffective as
rest is necessary for repairing injured parts. Thistreatment, would early activity be better?
proposed idea of rest as a treatment was furtherSeveral studies have looked at the effects of
amplified by John Hilton (1804-1878), a Britishadvice to stay active in the treatment of acute
surgeon, in his 1862 series of lectures on "Restlow back pain and found that advice to stay
and Pain" to the Royal College of Surgeons. Heactive was better or similar to advice to rest in
claimed that it is the natural treatment for thebed. In an update of a 2004 Cochrane Review of
inflammation of injury and wounds.trials on bed rest for acute low back pain and
Their theory of injury leading to an inflammatorysciatica, it was found that for patients with acute
response that requires rest to heal the body hadpain, advice to rest in bed was less effective in
a huge influence throughout the field of medicinereducing pain and improving an individual's ability to
even though their works revolves around only onperform every day activities than advice to stay
inflammation and wounds. Physicians all over theactive. For patients with sciatica, there was little
world started to use rest as a treatment for aor no difference between advice to rest in bed
wide range of conditions, from myocardialand advice to stay active.
infarction to normal childbirth.For chronic back pain sufferers, exercise therapy
Throughout the 19th century, the orthopedichas been supported by good evidence to reducing
principle of rest became dominant. The rationaletime taken to return to work and improving
of rest for back pain started from the idea thatfunctional status. Patients prescribed with graded
pain was due to injury. With injury, inflammationexercises have been shown to return to work
occurs and thus rest was essential for healing. Ifsooner, have less disability, and have fewer pain
the primary injury was not properly treated withcomplaints than patients treated with medications
rest, chronic pain would develop. It was believedand bed rest.
that movements, physical activities and repeatedConclusion
back injuries during the inflammatory phase mayGiven the extensive research done in recent
increase pain and so must be harmful, and thusyears, there is rising evidence to point towards
should be avoided.avoidance of bed rest for the management of
This thinking was later applied in the treatment ofback pain. Advice on early, progressive activity,
a ruptured disc, where the disc "comes out". Thewith no more than 2 days of bed rest, will serve
idea was that with bed rest, i.e. lying down, discas the preferred current approach.
pressure is the lowest and the disc will somehowReferences
"go back". Unfortunately, there was no scientific
evidence back then to support bed rest as1. Allan, David B. and Waddell, Gordon(1989). A
treatment. Orthopaedic doctors just followed withhistorical perspective on low back pain and
what was taught to them, i.e. bed rest. By 1900,disability',Acta Orthopaedica,60:3,1-23.
a standard orthopaedic text was published and2. Deyo RA, Diehl AK, Rosenthal M. How many
recommended two to six weeks of bed rest fordays of bed rest for acute low back pain? The
acute back pain.New England Journal of Medicine 1986;
Doubts Form in Approach315:1064-1070.
Although some doctors during the 19th century3. Gorden Waddell. The Back Pain Revolution.
did question the use of bed rest, it was not untilChurchill Livingstone, New York. 1999.
the 1980s that its efficacy as a treatment for4. Hagen KB, Hilde G, Jamtvedt G, Winnem M. Bed
back pain began to be seriously questioned.rest for acute low-back pain and sciatica.
However, many then still felt that some rest wasCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004,
necessary, and initial studies only questioned theIssue 4. Art. No.: CD001254. DOI: 10.1002
amount of rest that was needed rather than14651858.CD001254.pub2.
whether it was needed at all.5. Lindstrom I, Ohlund C, Eek C, et al. Mobility,
In 1986, Deyo et al were the first few tostrength, and fitness after a graded activity
investigate the use of bed rest in low back pain.program for patients with subacute low back pain:
The study compared the functional status anda randomized prospective clinical study with a
symptoms of a group that received 7 days ofbehavioral therapy approach. Spine 1992;
bed rest with a second group that received 217:641-652.
days of bed rest. No difference was found6. Lindstrom I, Ohlund C, Eek C, et al. The effect
between the two groups in terms of theof graded activity on patients with subacute low
functional status and symptoms. This later formedback pain: a randomized prospective clinical study
the basis for several guidelines that advise nowith an operant-conditioning behavorial approach.
more than 2 days of rest for patients with acutePhysical Therapy 1992; 72:279-293.
low back pain.