Why Plyometrics Workouts Are Not The Best Way To Increase Vertical Height!

There are many sports experts out there thatskills were already very good) who added
claim you can increase vertical height by usingplyometrics to their normal weight training. They
plyometrics alone!saw an increase in vertical leap of 11%. There
Let's see why this statement is untrue! There arewas also a description of a study done at the
many studies that prove that plyometrics are notHuman Performance Lab at Oregon State that
the best way to increase vertical height!compared plyometrics (jumps onto a box, double
An 8-week study found no significantleg hops and split squat jumps) and squatting
improvement in long jump performance or verticaltwice per week to one or the other. The squat
jump by 26 college-age subjects who performedonly group increase vertical leap 3.30 centimeters.
depth jumps 2x a week (1).Plyometrics only showed a 3.81 cm increase and
Another study reported no significant difference inthe combination training increased 10.67 cm which
the vertical jump between a group training withis a big difference.
an isokinetic leg press and a group training withMy issue with plyometrics is that it has not been
depth jumps (2).studied enough for the average person to take
A study by Clutch concluded that plyometricsup this kind of workout. The height that people
exercises (depth jumps of various heights) are nojump from has to be exact, the technique at
more effective than a regular jumping routine forwhich the land has to be as near perfect as
increasing vertical jump and leg strength (3).possible, the coach has to really know what they
And yet another study showed no significantare doing. If you are doing it from a book, then
differences in the 40-yard dash and the verticalstay well away from plyometrics. If you have a
jump between a weight training group versus aqualified coach who has done this kind training and
group using plyometrics (4).really knows there stuff, then go for it.
Another study found no significant differences inReferences
dynamic leg strength and leg power between a1) Scoles, G. 1978. Depth jumping! Does it really
group who only performed maximum verticalwork? "Athletic Journal" 58 (January):48-50,74-76.
jumps (from ground level), and two groups who2) Blattner, S., and L. Noble. 1979. Relative effects
performed depth jumps from varying heights(5).of isokinetic and plyometric training on vertical
And it gets even better, because a couple ofjumping performance. "Research Quarterly" 50
other studies concluded that plyometrics have no(4):583-588. 3) Clutch, D., M. Wilton, C. McGown
effect on power development/performance (6,7).and G.R. Bryce. 1983. The effect of depth jumps
Yet another study found no significant differencesand weight training on leg strength and vertical
in the vertical jump, the leg press and peakjump. "Research Quarterly" 54:5-10. 4) Ford Jr, H.
power of the quads between a group whoT., J.R. Puckett, J.P. Drummond, K.Sawyer, K.Gantt
performed a strength training program and aand C.Fussell. 1983. Effects of three combinations
group who performed a strength training programof plyometric and weight training programs on
and plyometrics(8).selected physical fitness test items. "Perceptual
But plyometrics might be good for one thing andand Motor Skills" 56:919-922. 5) Blakey, J. B., and
that is causing sport injuries!D.Southard. 1987. The combined effects of weight
Cook and his coworkers noted the risk of injurytraining and plyometrics on dynamic leg strength
associated with plyometrics (9).and leg power. "Journal of Applied Sport Science
Hutchins states that the use of plyometricsResearch" 1(1):14-16. 6) Durak, E. 1987. Physical
exercises is "irresponsible" (10). The mostperformance responses to muscle lengthening and
common plyometrics related injuries are patellarweight training exercises in young women. "Journal
tendonitis (11,12) and stress fractures (11). Manyof Applied Sport Science Research" 1(3):60. 7)
others have questioned the safety of plyometrics.Christenson, D., and S. Melville. 1988. The effects
Having said that, you can see why, plyometricsof depth jumps on university football players.
are not the best way to increase vertical height!"Journal of Applied Sport Science Research"
There is absolutely no scientific basis to it- the2(3):54. 8) Kramer, J. F., A. Morrow and A. Leger.
scientific evidence proves it to bee harmful and1993. Changes in rowing ergometer, weight lifting,
not beneficial.vertical jump and isokinetic performance in
At best you can be injured if you do not haveresponse to standard and standard plus
the necessary strength base! Having said that, it isplyometric training programs. "International Journal
imperative to develop a foundation of strengthof Sports Medicine" 14:449-454. 9) Cook, S.D., G.
with strength/ weight training program beforeSchultz, M. L. Omey, M. W. Wolfe and M. F. Brunet.
using plyometrics!1993. Development of lower leg strength and
Plyometrics should be performed only if yourflexibility with the strength show. "The American
body is strong enough to handle it.Journal of Sports Medicine" 21:445-448. 10)
Here are a few studies that prove that aHutchins, K. 1992. "Super Slow: The ultimate
plyometrics training system in combination with aexercise protocol." 2d ed. Casselberry, FL:Super
strength training program can give you goodSlow Systems. 11) Wikgren, S. 1988. The
resultsplyometrics debate. "Coaching Women's
In an issue of the Penn State Sports MedicineBasketball" 1 (May/June):10-13. 12) Horrigan, J., and
Newsletter there are numerous studies thatD. Shaw. 1990. Plyometrics: The dangers of depth
prove this point!jumps. "High Intensity Training Newsletter
One was of Finnish volleyball players (whose jump2(4):15-21.